Who do you believe about developments in Syria?

- Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : Who do you believe about developments in Syria?
link : Who do you believe about developments in Syria?

Personally, I don't believe anyone.  

Personally, I don't believe anyone.  

Huffington Post Arabic: misogyny by other names

- Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : Huffington Post Arabic: misogyny by other names
link : Huffington Post Arabic: misogyny by other names

The Huffington Post of the Qatari regime has become notorious for vomiting sexism on regular basis. Theo there day they mocked how women drive.

The Huffington Post of the Qatari regime has become notorious for vomiting sexism on regular basis. Theo there day they mocked how women drive.

A game: how to torture Iraqis

- Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : A game: how to torture Iraqis
link : A game: how to torture Iraqis

"In the game, which is still in development, players assume the role of an American service member stationed at Camp Bucca, a detention center that was located near the port city of Umm Qasr in southeast Iraq, at an undetermined time during the Iraq War. Throughout the game, players interact with Iraqi prisoners, who are clothed in the camp’s trademark yellow jumpsuits and occasionally have black hoods pulled over their heads. The player must interrogate the prisoners, choosing between methods like waterboarding or electrocution to extract information. If an interrogation goes too far, the questioner can kill the prisoner." (thanks Amir)

"In the game, which is still in development, players assume the role of an American service member stationed at Camp Bucca, a detention center that was located near the port city of Umm Qasr in southeast Iraq, at an undetermined time during the Iraq War. Throughout the game, players interact with Iraqi prisoners, who are clothed in the camp’s trademark yellow jumpsuits and occasionally have black hoods pulled over their heads. The player must interrogate the prisoners, choosing between methods like waterboarding or electrocution to extract information. If an interrogation goes too far, the questioner can kill the prisoner." (thanks Amir)

corruption among the Syrian regime forces and their allies

- Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : corruption among the Syrian regime forces and their allies
link : corruption among the Syrian regime forces and their allies

A source has told me about the extensive corruption among the ranks of Syrian officers (which is not new and not surprising) and also among their allies, including Hizbullah and Shi`ite militias and others.  Apparently, Iranian commanders have been failing to putting an end to that.  Smuggling is wide open especially through the port of Latakia.  No one who enters the Syrian war can stay clean.  

A source has told me about the extensive corruption among the ranks of Syrian officers (which is not new and not surprising) and also among their allies, including Hizbullah and Shi`ite militias and others.  Apparently, Iranian commanders have been failing to putting an end to that.  Smuggling is wide open especially through the port of Latakia.  No one who enters the Syrian war can stay clean.  

It is hilarious that Western media now are in love with suicide bombers: the Guardian as example

- Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : It is hilarious that Western media now are in love with suicide bombers: the Guardian as example
link : It is hilarious that Western media now are in love with suicide bombers: the Guardian as example

"but the rebels gambled on a double advantage: surprise and suicide bombers."

"but the rebels gambled on a double advantage: surprise and suicide bombers."

How the Guardian newspaper reports about Syrian war: cheerleading for Jihadis

- Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : How the Guardian newspaper reports about Syrian war: cheerleading for Jihadis
link : How the Guardian newspaper reports about Syrian war: cheerleading for Jihadis

Notice that Guardian instead of the referring to the Jihadis by the Jihadi names of their groups, as in Nusrah (which did most of the fighting in Aleppo) refers to them simply as "rebels":  "Soon the rebels were sharing pictures of abandoned artillery and a smashed portrait of President Bashar al-Assad on Twitter".  They almost want to call them "secular Jihadi rebels".  And then they quote a guy who does not report a chemical attack but he predicts a chemical attack: "“We expect revenge bombing by the regime, including, possibly, chemical weapons,” said Zaher Sahloul, a Syrian-American doctor who coordinates medical aid in the city."...And notice the tone of coverage: "Still, for the rebels, it has been a remarkable triumph against the odds.".  If those Jihadi rebels were fighting Israel, such language would have led to the dismissal of the reporters using such language.  And then the paper has a tribute to Al-Qa`idah: "That rebranding put the group in a strong position to capitalise on last week’s campaign, particularly if it can consolidate a victory that casts it as a champion of Aleppo’s battered civilians."  And then the reader is invited to not judge the Jihadi terrorist groups because the Guardian wants them to know that the regime is worse: "has set disturbingly extreme opposition groups against an ever more brutal government."  And the paper tells readers that Syrian regime bombs indiscriminately but can't get itself to say the same about the Syrian rebels: "Rebels have deployed “hell cannons” – crude artillery using gas cylinders – that have also been called indiscriminate."   Have also been called? They can't get themselves to call them indiscriminate?  And then the Guardian introduces a new term for Jihadi terrorists: they are merely conservative: "But many of the groups fighting there are conservative Islamists, and moderates are worried that for this assault they have gathered around Jolani’s group."   And notice that in the brief sections about parties of the war in Syria it does not mention that Ahrar Ash-Sham had a major role by Al-Qa`idah in the founding.  

Notice that Guardian instead of the referring to the Jihadis by the Jihadi names of their groups, as in Nusrah (which did most of the fighting in Aleppo) refers to them simply as "rebels":  "Soon the rebels were sharing pictures of abandoned artillery and a smashed portrait of President Bashar al-Assad on Twitter".  They almost want to call them "secular Jihadi rebels".  And then they quote a guy who does not report a chemical attack but he predicts a chemical attack: "“We expect revenge bombing by the regime, including, possibly, chemical weapons,” said Zaher Sahloul, a Syrian-American doctor who coordinates medical aid in the city."...And notice the tone of coverage: "Still, for the rebels, it has been a remarkable triumph against the odds.".  If those Jihadi rebels were fighting Israel, such language would have led to the dismissal of the reporters using such language.  And then the paper has a tribute to Al-Qa`idah: "That rebranding put the group in a strong position to capitalise on last week’s campaign, particularly if it can consolidate a victory that casts it as a champion of Aleppo’s battered civilians."  And then the reader is invited to not judge the Jihadi terrorist groups because the Guardian wants them to know that the regime is worse: "has set disturbingly extreme opposition groups against an ever more brutal government."  And the paper tells readers that Syrian regime bombs indiscriminately but can't get itself to say the same about the Syrian rebels: "Rebels have deployed “hell cannons” – crude artillery using gas cylinders – that have also been called indiscriminate."   Have also been called? They can't get themselves to call them indiscriminate?  And then the Guardian introduces a new term for Jihadi terrorists: they are merely conservative: "But many of the groups fighting there are conservative Islamists, and moderates are worried that for this assault they have gathered around Jolani’s group."   And notice that in the brief sections about parties of the war in Syria it does not mention that Ahrar Ash-Sham had a major role by Al-Qa`idah in the founding.  

Richard Engels on NBC News

- Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : Richard Engels on NBC News
link : Richard Engels on NBC News

I rarely if ever watch US TV news (or any other TV news for that matter).  I find that print news saves to time as there are no distractions of visuals.  So I saw a report by Richard Engel about Aleppo: the report could have easily been signed with the disclaimer: this report was brought to you by ISIS and Al-Qa`idah in Syria.  Unbelievable cheerleading for Jihadi groups.  Worse: he even aired most footage from Al-Qa`idah: was there not an American law against promoting the propaganda of Al-Qa`idah or has the US government forgiven the terrorists of Sep. 11?  I really believe that the Obama administration has relaxed US laws against Al-Qa`idah to use their services in the Syria war.  Worse: Engel aired footage of Jihadis helping civilians cross the street. I kid you not.  This is what passes as news in the US these days?

I rarely if ever watch US TV news (or any other TV news for that matter).  I find that print news saves to time as there are no distractions of visuals.  So I saw a report by Richard Engel about Aleppo: the report could have easily been signed with the disclaimer: this report was brought to you by ISIS and Al-Qa`idah in Syria.  Unbelievable cheerleading for Jihadi groups.  Worse: he even aired most footage from Al-Qa`idah: was there not an American law against promoting the propaganda of Al-Qa`idah or has the US government forgiven the terrorists of Sep. 11?  I really believe that the Obama administration has relaxed US laws against Al-Qa`idah to use their services in the Syria war.  Worse: Engel aired footage of Jihadis helping civilians cross the street. I kid you not.  This is what passes as news in the US these days?