It is hilarious that Western media now are in love with suicide bombers: the Guardian as example

- Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : It is hilarious that Western media now are in love with suicide bombers: the Guardian as example
link : It is hilarious that Western media now are in love with suicide bombers: the Guardian as example

"but the rebels gambled on a double advantage: surprise and suicide bombers."

"but the rebels gambled on a double advantage: surprise and suicide bombers."

How the Guardian newspaper reports about Syrian war: cheerleading for Jihadis

- Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : How the Guardian newspaper reports about Syrian war: cheerleading for Jihadis
link : How the Guardian newspaper reports about Syrian war: cheerleading for Jihadis

Notice that Guardian instead of the referring to the Jihadis by the Jihadi names of their groups, as in Nusrah (which did most of the fighting in Aleppo) refers to them simply as "rebels":  "Soon the rebels were sharing pictures of abandoned artillery and a smashed portrait of President Bashar al-Assad on Twitter".  They almost want to call them "secular Jihadi rebels".  And then they quote a guy who does not report a chemical attack but he predicts a chemical attack: "“We expect revenge bombing by the regime, including, possibly, chemical weapons,” said Zaher Sahloul, a Syrian-American doctor who coordinates medical aid in the city."...And notice the tone of coverage: "Still, for the rebels, it has been a remarkable triumph against the odds.".  If those Jihadi rebels were fighting Israel, such language would have led to the dismissal of the reporters using such language.  And then the paper has a tribute to Al-Qa`idah: "That rebranding put the group in a strong position to capitalise on last week’s campaign, particularly if it can consolidate a victory that casts it as a champion of Aleppo’s battered civilians."  And then the reader is invited to not judge the Jihadi terrorist groups because the Guardian wants them to know that the regime is worse: "has set disturbingly extreme opposition groups against an ever more brutal government."  And the paper tells readers that Syrian regime bombs indiscriminately but can't get itself to say the same about the Syrian rebels: "Rebels have deployed “hell cannons” – crude artillery using gas cylinders – that have also been called indiscriminate."   Have also been called? They can't get themselves to call them indiscriminate?  And then the Guardian introduces a new term for Jihadi terrorists: they are merely conservative: "But many of the groups fighting there are conservative Islamists, and moderates are worried that for this assault they have gathered around Jolani’s group."   And notice that in the brief sections about parties of the war in Syria it does not mention that Ahrar Ash-Sham had a major role by Al-Qa`idah in the founding.  

Notice that Guardian instead of the referring to the Jihadis by the Jihadi names of their groups, as in Nusrah (which did most of the fighting in Aleppo) refers to them simply as "rebels":  "Soon the rebels were sharing pictures of abandoned artillery and a smashed portrait of President Bashar al-Assad on Twitter".  They almost want to call them "secular Jihadi rebels".  And then they quote a guy who does not report a chemical attack but he predicts a chemical attack: "“We expect revenge bombing by the regime, including, possibly, chemical weapons,” said Zaher Sahloul, a Syrian-American doctor who coordinates medical aid in the city."...And notice the tone of coverage: "Still, for the rebels, it has been a remarkable triumph against the odds.".  If those Jihadi rebels were fighting Israel, such language would have led to the dismissal of the reporters using such language.  And then the paper has a tribute to Al-Qa`idah: "That rebranding put the group in a strong position to capitalise on last week’s campaign, particularly if it can consolidate a victory that casts it as a champion of Aleppo’s battered civilians."  And then the reader is invited to not judge the Jihadi terrorist groups because the Guardian wants them to know that the regime is worse: "has set disturbingly extreme opposition groups against an ever more brutal government."  And the paper tells readers that Syrian regime bombs indiscriminately but can't get itself to say the same about the Syrian rebels: "Rebels have deployed “hell cannons” – crude artillery using gas cylinders – that have also been called indiscriminate."   Have also been called? They can't get themselves to call them indiscriminate?  And then the Guardian introduces a new term for Jihadi terrorists: they are merely conservative: "But many of the groups fighting there are conservative Islamists, and moderates are worried that for this assault they have gathered around Jolani’s group."   And notice that in the brief sections about parties of the war in Syria it does not mention that Ahrar Ash-Sham had a major role by Al-Qa`idah in the founding.  

Richard Engels on NBC News

- Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : Richard Engels on NBC News
link : Richard Engels on NBC News

I rarely if ever watch US TV news (or any other TV news for that matter).  I find that print news saves to time as there are no distractions of visuals.  So I saw a report by Richard Engel about Aleppo: the report could have easily been signed with the disclaimer: this report was brought to you by ISIS and Al-Qa`idah in Syria.  Unbelievable cheerleading for Jihadi groups.  Worse: he even aired most footage from Al-Qa`idah: was there not an American law against promoting the propaganda of Al-Qa`idah or has the US government forgiven the terrorists of Sep. 11?  I really believe that the Obama administration has relaxed US laws against Al-Qa`idah to use their services in the Syria war.  Worse: Engel aired footage of Jihadis helping civilians cross the street. I kid you not.  This is what passes as news in the US these days?

I rarely if ever watch US TV news (or any other TV news for that matter).  I find that print news saves to time as there are no distractions of visuals.  So I saw a report by Richard Engel about Aleppo: the report could have easily been signed with the disclaimer: this report was brought to you by ISIS and Al-Qa`idah in Syria.  Unbelievable cheerleading for Jihadi groups.  Worse: he even aired most footage from Al-Qa`idah: was there not an American law against promoting the propaganda of Al-Qa`idah or has the US government forgiven the terrorists of Sep. 11?  I really believe that the Obama administration has relaxed US laws against Al-Qa`idah to use their services in the Syria war.  Worse: Engel aired footage of Jihadis helping civilians cross the street. I kid you not.  This is what passes as news in the US these days?

This guy wants US to learn from Russian, Chinese, and Israeli military: love of steel-rain munitions

- Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : This guy wants US to learn from Russian, Chinese, and Israeli military: love of steel-rain munitions
link : This guy wants US to learn from Russian, Chinese, and Israeli military: love of steel-rain munitions

"Tragically, all of America’s steel-rain munitions — millions of shells and warheads — are gone, intentionally destroyed by the past two administrations in a sacrifice to the gods of political correctness. They agreed to give up all submunition weapons after other nations (which had no steel rain) signed a treaty banning such weapons because they produce too many duds that remain on the battlefield and pose risks to civilians. Russia, China and Israel believed they had real wars to fight and ignored the treaty."

"Tragically, all of America’s steel-rain munitions — millions of shells and warheads — are gone, intentionally destroyed by the past two administrations in a sacrifice to the gods of political correctness. They agreed to give up all submunition weapons after other nations (which had no steel rain) signed a treaty banning such weapons because they produce too many duds that remain on the battlefield and pose risks to civilians. Russia, China and Israel believed they had real wars to fight and ignored the treaty."

I have never seen such cheerleading for terrorism as I have been seeing from DC think tanks as of late--brought to you by oil and gas money

- Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : I have never seen such cheerleading for terrorism as I have been seeing from DC think tanks as of late--brought to you by oil and gas money
link : I have never seen such cheerleading for terrorism as I have been seeing from DC think tanks as of late--brought to you by oil and gas money

"Ironically, the only parties showing creativity and adaptability in Aleppo are the beleaguered rebels themselves, who are trying to break the siege from inside and outside of the city. The most powerful component of this insurgent alliance is Jaish al-Fateh, a coalition dominated by the hardline Salafist groups Ahrar al-Sham and Jabhat Fateh al-Sham"—until recently known as the al-Qaeda affiliated Nusra Front."  If those rebel groups are fighting Israel, people would have gone to jail for praising them and singing their tributes.  

"Ironically, the only parties showing creativity and adaptability in Aleppo are the beleaguered rebels themselves, who are trying to break the siege from inside and outside of the city. The most powerful component of this insurgent alliance is Jaish al-Fateh, a coalition dominated by the hardline Salafist groups Ahrar al-Sham and Jabhat Fateh al-Sham"—until recently known as the al-Qaeda affiliated Nusra Front."  If those rebel groups are fighting Israel, people would have gone to jail for praising them and singing their tributes.  

Ashraf Marwan

- Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : Ashraf Marwan
link : Ashraf Marwan

I have been reading the new book "The Angel: The Egyptian Spy who Saved Israel" by Uri Bar-Joseph.   1) typical Israeli propaganda account of an Arab spy: exaggeration of his contributions and usefulness. 2) this account proves that he in fact started his services in the Sadat era and NOT in the Nasser era as previous accounts had mentioned. 3) Israeli deep-seated racist distrust of Arabs helps the Arabs: they can never fully trust the Arabs even if he was working for them.  4) Sami Sharaf who worked for Nasser bears responsibility in hiring and trusting this guy.  It is clear even from this account that Nasser never liked Marwan and never trusted him.  

I have been reading the new book "The Angel: The Egyptian Spy who Saved Israel" by Uri Bar-Joseph.   1) typical Israeli propaganda account of an Arab spy: exaggeration of his contributions and usefulness. 2) this account proves that he in fact started his services in the Sadat era and NOT in the Nasser era as previous accounts had mentioned. 3) Israeli deep-seated racist distrust of Arabs helps the Arabs: they can never fully trust the Arabs even if he was working for them.  4) Sami Sharaf who worked for Nasser bears responsibility in hiring and trusting this guy.  It is clear even from this account that Nasser never liked Marwan and never trusted him.  

Ibrahim Yusuf's son in Aleppo

- Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : Ibrahim Yusuf's son in Aleppo
link : Ibrahim Yusuf's son in Aleppo

What has not been mentioned in the Western press is this: 1) that the battle name for Syrian fighters in Aleppo is "Ibrahim Yusuf"--the fellow was the Ikhwani fighter who massacred Alawite officers in the Aleppo military academy back in 1979. 2) his son is a leader in the Nur Ad-Din Az-Zanagi group-which receives training and supplies from US government; 3) the fellow who beheaded the Palestinian child has been seen in the fighting footage in Aleppo.  

What has not been mentioned in the Western press is this: 1) that the battle name for Syrian fighters in Aleppo is "Ibrahim Yusuf"--the fellow was the Ikhwani fighter who massacred Alawite officers in the Aleppo military academy back in 1979. 2) his son is a leader in the Nur Ad-Din Az-Zanagi group-which receives training and supplies from US government; 3) the fellow who beheaded the Palestinian child has been seen in the fighting footage in Aleppo.