Hillary Clinton..... IS NOT FOR COPS OR LAW ENFORCEMENT - Hallo sahabat
Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Hillary Clinton..... IS NOT FOR COPS OR LAW ENFORCEMENT , kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.
Judul :
Hillary Clinton..... IS NOT FOR COPS OR LAW ENFORCEMENT link :
Hillary Clinton..... IS NOT FOR COPS OR LAW ENFORCEMENT
Baca juga
Hillary Clinton..... IS NOT FOR COPS OR LAW ENFORCEMENT
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFIuLyBLaRGgIuo-G2JLTWBv5L41S772AStWF3CV7yRQkEGpsP8ZfeWwNHaOErtnvSKJyVmGyFfKvPHRJ8W-V1wB7Q4Af6hRC-yjpZmv1VLfunIdHO6s02I3tvgk9_yAn_HM8eFflASHBj/s320/hillary.jpg)
|
At Least We Now Know Where Clinton Stands And It Sure Isn't With Law Enforcement Democratic presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, has confirmed what many of you have long suspected - she is not a friend of law enforcement. Last Friday, the Clinton campaign informed the National Fraternal Order of Police that Clinton would not be completing the FOP's list of questions for presidential candidates and would not be seeking the FOP's endorsement. Outraged by this brash political move, FOP President Chuck Canterbury responded immediately. His message was one of shock and disbelieve, especially coming just after police officers were assassinated in Dallas and Baton Rouge. Clinton's actions appear to be a cold and calculated effort to win the presidency at any cost or any deed. Look at this as only a Clinton political strategy. At first, this high handed rejection of law enforcement appears to be a gaffe, but it is not. Today, political endorsements do little to get votes from members of endorsing organizations. Organizations cannot deliver the votes of their members. The FOP has this problem, along with every other organization. Even the Tea Party has this problem. However, endorsements are not free. They have a price - the votes of members who do not agree with the endorsement - the backlash. Clinton is more concerned about not pissing - off Leslie McFadden than not pissing - off Chuck Canterbury. Sad, but true. Even with mistakes and questionable practices, there is no denying the goals and efforts of law enforcement are to keep all of us safe - black or white. Law enforcement is the only thing standing between us and the barbarians. Law enforcement even protects the barbarians from the barbarians. While I have sympathy for Leslie McFadden concerning the loss of her son, I cannot condone or ignore the "burn this bitch down" reaction. It is well known in Washington circles that the Clintons are for the Clintons. This latest action just validates those opinions. It is not too late for Clinton to reverse her position on this issue, but I doubt if she will. She would have to be convinced there would be a net gain of votes. The problem is not just with Clinton. Such, win at any cost, tactics are not beneath Trump, but he has supported law enforcement throughout the campaign. Jerry Flynn and his New England PBA and their early endorsement of Trump have played a big role in Trump's attitude toward law enforcement. Perhaps, the time has come for law enforcement to move to the Republican Party, even with Ted Cruz and the Tea Party. Most of you vote Republican now. It is amazing how police officers vote based on law and order, rather than their pay check. The Democratic Party is quickly becoming the anti-police department party, and they have every right to do that. The Republicans are currently hell bent on starving law enforcement budgets in the name of fiscal responsibility. Lately, the Democrats are slashing police budgets just as aggressively as Republicans. There are three months until the election. Law enforcement needs to decide quickly and unequivocally who to support even if it the loser. Both Democrats and Republicans need to decide where they stand and recognize the consequences of their stands. Forget about Gary Johnson as a potential third party winner. Ten minutes of research will cause any rational police officer to reject him. |
|
|
|
Demikianlah Artikel Hillary Clinton..... IS NOT FOR COPS OR LAW ENFORCEMENT
Sekianlah artikel Hillary Clinton..... IS NOT FOR COPS OR LAW ENFORCEMENT kali ini, mudah-mudahan bisa memberi manfaat untuk anda semua. baiklah, sampai jumpa di postingan artikel lainnya.
Anda sekarang membaca artikel Hillary Clinton..... IS NOT FOR COPS OR LAW ENFORCEMENT dengan alamat link https://beritadetikini1.blogspot.com/2016/08/hillary-clinton-is-not-for-cops-or-law.html
Post a Comment