Worth reading 6: The Berlin principles - Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Worth reading 6: The Berlin principles, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.
Judul : Worth reading 6: The Berlin principles
link : Worth reading 6: The Berlin principles
Just heard about this from Gary Barron.
Barron, Gary R.S. 2016. "The Berlin Principles on Ranking Higher Education Institutions: limitations, legitimacy, and value conflict." Higher Education, Online First, pp.1-17.
Abstract
University rankings have been widely criticized and examined in terms of the environment they create for universities. In this paper I reverse the question by examining how ranking organizations have responded to criticisms. I contrast ranking values and evaluation with those practiced by academic communities. I argue that the business of ranking higher education institutions is not one that lends itself to isomorphism with scholarly values and evaluation and that this dissonance creates reputational risk for ranking organizations. I argue that such risk caused global ranking organizations to create the Berlin Principles on Ranking Higher Education Institutions, which I also demonstrate are decoupled from actual ranking practices. I argue that the Berlin Principles can be best regarded as a legitimizing practice to institutionalize rankings and symbolically align them with academic values and systems of evaluation in the face of criticism. Finally, I argue that despite dissonance between ranking and academic evaluation there is still enough similarity that choosing to adopt rankings as a strategy to distinguish one's institution can be regarded as a legitimate option for universities.
Anda sekarang membaca artikel Worth reading 6: The Berlin principles dengan alamat link https://beritadetikini1.blogspot.com/2016/06/worth-reading-6-berlin-principles.html
Judul : Worth reading 6: The Berlin principles
link : Worth reading 6: The Berlin principles
Worth reading 6: The Berlin principles
Just heard about this from Gary Barron.
Barron, Gary R.S. 2016. "The Berlin Principles on Ranking Higher Education Institutions: limitations, legitimacy, and value conflict." Higher Education, Online First, pp.1-17.
Abstract
University rankings have been widely criticized and examined in terms of the environment they create for universities. In this paper I reverse the question by examining how ranking organizations have responded to criticisms. I contrast ranking values and evaluation with those practiced by academic communities. I argue that the business of ranking higher education institutions is not one that lends itself to isomorphism with scholarly values and evaluation and that this dissonance creates reputational risk for ranking organizations. I argue that such risk caused global ranking organizations to create the Berlin Principles on Ranking Higher Education Institutions, which I also demonstrate are decoupled from actual ranking practices. I argue that the Berlin Principles can be best regarded as a legitimizing practice to institutionalize rankings and symbolically align them with academic values and systems of evaluation in the face of criticism. Finally, I argue that despite dissonance between ranking and academic evaluation there is still enough similarity that choosing to adopt rankings as a strategy to distinguish one's institution can be regarded as a legitimate option for universities.
Demikianlah Artikel Worth reading 6: The Berlin principles
Sekianlah artikel Worth reading 6: The Berlin principles kali ini, mudah-mudahan bisa memberi manfaat untuk anda semua. baiklah, sampai jumpa di postingan artikel lainnya.
Anda sekarang membaca artikel Worth reading 6: The Berlin principles dengan alamat link https://beritadetikini1.blogspot.com/2016/06/worth-reading-6-berlin-principles.html
Post a Comment