Ranking Rankings Again - Hallo sahabat Berita Hari ini, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Ranking Rankings Again, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.
Judul : Ranking Rankings Again
link : Ranking Rankings Again
Magnus Gunnarsson of the University of Gothenburg has reminded me of a 2010 report which included an assessment of methodology based on IREG's Berlin principles.
There were 16 Berlin principles, 14 of which were given weighted subscores in the report. The values and weighting were determined subjectively although the rankers were evidently well informed.
The Berlin principles were grouped in four categories, Purpose and Goals of Rankings, Design and Weighting of Indicators, Collection and Processing of Data and Presentation of Ranking Results. For more information see here.
The ranking of rankings by methodology is as follows. It is obviously out of date.
Anda sekarang membaca artikel Ranking Rankings Again dengan alamat link https://beritadetikini1.blogspot.com/2016/03/ranking-rankings-again.html
Judul : Ranking Rankings Again
link : Ranking Rankings Again
Ranking Rankings Again
Magnus Gunnarsson of the University of Gothenburg has reminded me of a 2010 report which included an assessment of methodology based on IREG's Berlin principles.
There were 16 Berlin principles, 14 of which were given weighted subscores in the report. The values and weighting were determined subjectively although the rankers were evidently well informed.
The Berlin principles were grouped in four categories, Purpose and Goals of Rankings, Design and Weighting of Indicators, Collection and Processing of Data and Presentation of Ranking Results. For more information see here.
The ranking of rankings by methodology is as follows. It is obviously out of date.
Position | Ranking | Overall method score |
|---|---|---|
| 1= | CHE (Germany) | 3.10 |
| 1= | Webometrics | 3.10 |
| 3 | HEEACT (now Taiwan National University) | 2.90 |
| 4 | ARWU (Shanghai) | 2.80 |
| 5= | High Impact Universities (Australia) | 2.60 |
| 5= | Observatory (sustainable development) | 2.60 |
| 7= | Scimago | 2.40 |
| 7= | CWTS Leiden ranking | 2.40 |
| 9 | THE | 2.30 |
| 10 | Mines Paris Tech | 2.20 |
| 11 | QS | 2.10 |
| 12 | Rater (Russia) | 1.70 |
Demikianlah Artikel Ranking Rankings Again
Sekianlah artikel Ranking Rankings Again kali ini, mudah-mudahan bisa memberi manfaat untuk anda semua. baiklah, sampai jumpa di postingan artikel lainnya.
Anda sekarang membaca artikel Ranking Rankings Again dengan alamat link https://beritadetikini1.blogspot.com/2016/03/ranking-rankings-again.html
Post a Comment